Essay --

The recognition of same-sex marriage is a political, social, and religious issue. Because of this same-sex marriage is a very controversial topic. Legal quotation of same sex marriage is comm besides referred to as marriage equality. galore(postnominal) advocates of marriage equality argue that laws restricting marriage to only heterosexuals purloin against homosexuals. On the other hand advocates against same-sex marriage argue that it would undo long-standing traditions and trade the meat of marriage in a damaging manor. In this call fork I will be arguing for same-sex marriage. The arguments mentioned as well as others will be arguees throughout this paper.Firstly I will discuss the reasons for marriage equality. I argue marriage equality is in the surmount interest for family life. Allowing homosexuals to form stable committed alliances through marriage would throw in for healthier homosexual relationships. You mucklet prevent people from macrocosm homosexual however giving those people the right to marry can help them experience greater personal happiness. Studies have suggested that not only does legalizing marriage in an area generally make homosexual individuals in that area happier it also makes them physically and mentally healthier and saves them money on health care (Hatzenbuehler, OCleirigh, Grasso, Mayer, Safren, & Bradford, 20012). I dont see any compelling reason to take away the joy homosexuals notice from marriage, this is one of the many another(prenominal) reasons I support marriage equality. Marriage of course creates families it provides the conditions for a healthy environment that is beneficial to the upbringing of children. Opponents of same-sex marriage ofttimes ground their arguments on parental and religious concerns. Many argue that sa... ...me-sex marriage. merely marriage is not solely defined as a relationship between a man and a woman. The definition of marriage has varied throughout history. Depending heavily on religious and political views of an individual society. advert and quote changing the meaning of marriage would not damage the meaning a marriage. It would still be the same binding contract that it is today. In conclusion I argue that banning same-sex marriage is discriminatory. It is discriminatory because it denies homosexuals the many benefits received by heterosexual couples. The right to marriage in the get together States has little to do with the religious and spiritual meaning of marriage. It has a chaw to do with social justice, extending a civil right to a minority group. This is why I argue for same-sex marriage. The freedom to marry regardless of gender preference should be allowed.